Just A Summary : Today's noun is: Reification http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2007/08/22/reification.rss en-us 40 Piers Cawley Practices Punditry Comment on Today's noun is: Reification by Giles Bowkett <p>Have you submitted this to Rails as a patch? There&#8217;s actually a ton of tiny repetitions in Rails, cleaning it up is a very very worthy goal. It&#8217;s getting to the point where it&#8217;s a pretty large code base.</p> Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:00 -0500 urn:uuid:48e8c8eb-5ea8-4d54-88ac-6baa3f60f9b0 http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2007/08/22/reification#comment-572 Comment on Today's noun is: Reification by Piers Cawley <p>I haven&#8217;t, no. I have some fairly serious differences of opinion with the Rails code base &#8211; I think every bug I&#8217;ve reported on the trac (admittedly not many) has been resolved as &#8216;wontfix&#8217; with commentary that leads me to believe that me and the chaps in the core team are thinking at right angles. Which makes me somewhat hesitant to go submitting a patch that adds no new features and won&#8217;t have any new tests associated with it.</p> <p>Still, there&#8217;s always the next patch I guess.</p> Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:12:02 -0500 urn:uuid:77b7c8f5-ac70-4298-8339-dc0266337440 http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2007/08/22/reification#comment-573 Comment on Today's noun is: Reification by Piers Cawley <p>All that said, I&#8217;m very close to having a patch ready to post to the trac which does the refactoring sketched in the article.</p> Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:46:08 -0500 urn:uuid:408e138a-115c-432b-ab59-bd0ea90de3d3 http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2007/08/22/reification#comment-574 Comment on Today's noun is: Reification by Yossef <p>I&#8217;m not sure what the core team is thinking much of the time, and I&#8217;ve had plenty to say about it (though not always very publicly). It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t appreciate the effort, but when I see some of the code connected to &#8216;david&#8217;, &#8216;rick&#8217;, or &#8216;bitsweat&#8217;, I wonder. I know it&#8217;s not all produced by them, but they are the ones who committed it.</p> <p>That&#8217;s not the point, anyway. The real reason I wanted to leave a comment is because my father once called me up to ask what &#8216;reify&#8217; meant and my initial reaction was &#8216;to make royal&#8217;.</p> Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:11:16 -0500 urn:uuid:80589040-3595-4b48-89ee-3ad79caed533 http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2007/08/22/reification#comment-575